ETL 1110-2-533
30 Sep 94
Table A-1
(Concluded)
Corps
Corps
Capacity
Project
Zone
Division
District
Location
River
KW
John H. Kerr
1
South Atlantic
Wilmington
North Carolina
Roanoke
240,000
and Virginia
Jones Bluff
1
South Atlantic
Mobile
Alabama
--
68,000
Keystone
1
Southwestern
Tulsa
Oklahoma
Arkansas
70,000
Laurel
1
Ohio River
Nashville
Kentucky
Laurel
61,000
Libby
2B
North Pacific
Seattle
Montana
Kootenai
525,000
Little Goose
2B
North Pacific
Walla Walla
Washington
Snake
810,000
Look Out Point
-Dexter
3
North
Pacific
Portland
Oregon
Willamette
135,000
Lost Creek
3
North
Pacific
Portland
Oregon
Rogue
49,000
Lower Granite
2B
North
Pacific
Walla Walla
Washington
Snake
810,000
L. Monumental
2B
North
Pacific
Walla Walla
Washington
Snake
810,000
McNary
2B
North
Pacific
Walla Walla
Oregon and
Columbia
980,000
Washington
Millers Ferry
0
South Atlantic
Mobile
Alabama
Alabama
75,000
Narrows
1
Lower Mississippi
Vicksburg
Arizona
Little Mo.
25,500
Valley
Norfolk
1
Southwestern
Little Rock
Arkansas and
White
80,550
Missouri
Oahe
0
Missouri River
Omaha
North Dakota and
Missouri
640,000
South Dakota
Old Hickory
1
Ohio River
Nashville
Tennessee
Cumberland
36,000
Ozark
1
Southwestern
Little Rock
Arkansas
Arkansas
100,000
Philpott
2A
South Atlantic
Wilmington
Virginia
Roanoke
14,000
R. B. Russell
2A
South Atlantic
Savannah
Georgia and
Savannah
600,000
South Carolina
Rob't S. Kerr
2A
Southwestern
Tulsa
Oklahoma
Arkansas
110,000
St. Marys
2A
North Central
Detroit
Michigan
St. Marys
18,400
Sam Rayburn
0
Southwestern
Ft. Worth
Texas
Angelina
52,000
St. Stephen
2A
South Atlantic
Charleston
South Carolina
Santee/Cooper
84,000
Stockton
1
Missouri River
Kansas City
Missouri
Sacramento
45,200
Table Rock
1
Southwestern
Little Rock
Arkansas and
White
200,000
Missouri
Tenkiller - Ferry
1
Southwestern
Tulsa
Oklahoma
Illinois
9,100
The Dalles
2B
North Pacific
Portland
Oregon and
Columbia
1,806,000
Washington
Walt George
0
South Atlantic
Mobile
Georgia and
Chattahoochee
130,000
Alabama
Webbers Falls
2A
Southwestern
Tulsa
Oklahoma
Arkansas
60,000
West Point
0
South Atlantic
Mobile
Georgia
Chattahoochee
73,375
Whittney
0
Southwestern
Ft. Worth
Texas
Brazos
30,000
Wolf Creek
1
Ohio River
Nashville
Kentucky
Cumberland
270,000
three Corps hydroelectric power plants by a team
Lifelines
composed of a recognized lifeline expert, Corps
design engineers, and project operations personnel.
During the walk-through process, it became evident
a. General. The original purpose of this report
that the most important electrical power lifeline
was to assess the vulnerability of hydroelectric
function was one of providing electrical power
power plants to earthquake damage that would
onsite in response to emergency conditions. For
instance, hydroelectric power plants can be isolated
communities recovering from the devastating effects
from the power grid when earthquake ground
of a major earthquake. The vulnerability of this
motions trip pressure-sensitive relays in
lifeline function was assessed by a walk-through of
A-11